The Evolution of Physician-Led Organizations in Healthcare 

By: Jeff Cohen

Throughout my 40 years of experience as a healthcare attorney and advisor, I have witnessed significant transformations in the business of medicine. Perhaps one of the most telling examples is the rise, fall, and evolution of Independent Practice Associations (IPAs), network models, and Management Services Organizations (MSOs). These structures embody how physicians and entrepreneurs have adapted to the complex and, at times, unforgiving healthcare landscape. Their development underscores a single truth I’ve consistently observed—success in the business of healthcare is not just about vision but about execution.

The Birth of IPAs and Early Ambitions

In the 1990s, IPAs emerged as a solution for independent physicians at risk of losing their seat at the table with payers. At the time, IPAs were owned and organized by panels of respected physicians. These physician-led associations presented themselves as a “one-stop” contracting solution for insurance companies. From a payer’s perspective, the value was apparent—contracting with one entity instead of managing contracts with hundreds of providers was far more efficient.

Yet, behind the curtain, the realities of managing such organizations exposed the limitations of their founders. Understanding concepts such as claims adjudication, medical loss ratio, third-party administration, or stop-loss insurance was, for many physicians, uncharted territory. While these knowledge gaps were of little consequence then, as many IPA panels were single-specialty and compensated primarily on a fee-for-service basis, the tides quickly began to shift. Capitated arrangements, which initially targeted lower-expense practices like chiropractic and podiatry, started to expand into broader specialties.

The Rise of Entrepreneurial Physicians

Unsatisfied with the status quo, entrepreneurial physicians began reimagining the structure and purpose of IPAs. They saw an opportunity not just in patient care but in carving a role for themselves in the “business side” of medicine. These visionaries began to lead network model IPAs, overseeing groups of physicians and charging administrative fees, typically 10-15%, off the top of managed contracts.

Utilizing third-party administrators (TPAs), and in many cases transitioning into TPAs themselves, network IPAs flourished during the ’90s. These were no longer groups of doctors bound by their clinical expertise—they were enterprises driven by efficiency, profitability, and scalability. For certain physicians, healthcare was no longer just a calling—it was a business model.

Enter Private Equity and Wall Street

With entrepreneurial physicians paving the way, it wasn’t long before private equity and Wall Street took notice. The business of medicine—and more specifically, its administrative side—had become a desirable investment. Concerns about physician autonomy and stable income streams were met with enticing offers backed by large private equity funds. Private practices were courted with promises of stability, cash infusions, and stock options.

The market recognized the potential early. MedPartners and similar entities flourished under this model, using public markets to rapidly acquire practices and infrastructure. NASDAQ amplified their success through quick amortization of acquisition costs, temporarily inflating financials and driving stock prices higher and higher. But as I’ve observed time and again, unchecked financial strategies often face regulatory reckoning. With the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) mandating longer amortization periods, these companies faced financial strain, declining stock prices, and dried-up capital for acquisitions. For many entities, the collapse was inevitable.

The Emergence of the MSO

Among the fallout emerged a resilient structure—the Management Services Organization (MSO). Born out of necessity and survival, the MSO has become the dominant aggregation platform in healthcare today. While initially designed to ensure compliance with prohibitions against corporate practice, the MSO has grown into much more.

When executed well, MSOs represent a sophisticated administrative management model capable of delivering measurable efficiencies. However, not all MSOs are created equal. Many overpromise and underdeliver, leaving their clients frustrated and disillusioned. The reality is that the success of any MSO, or any physician-led organization for that matter, rests largely on the most challenging component of any business—execution.

Lessons on Execution and Sustainability

The dream of marrying financial success with the business of medicine persists because of its undeniable allure. But as history has shown us, sustainability in this space requires careful planning, a deep understanding of market forces, and operational excellence.

Managing physician-led organizations, whether they take the form of IPAs, network models, or MSOs, requires more than a good idea. It demands a well-structured strategy, a commitment to transparency, and actionable insights into the delicate interplay of clinical care and administrative management. Over the decades, I’ve seen promising ventures derailed not by a lack of vision, but by an inability to execute the finer details—the very aspects that define sustained success.

Moving Forward—Practical Guidance from an Industry Veteran

For healthcare professionals and medical entrepreneurs seeking to establish or grow their service models, my advice is simple yet uncompromising—prioritize execution over ambition. Ensure compliance frameworks are robust, stakeholder communication is transparent, and every decision is firmly rooted in long-term sustainability and value creation.

Organizations that recognize the importance of operational excellence and align their vision with prudent execution are the ones that stand the test of time. From my vantage point as a trusted legal and strategic partner, I have found that achieving this balance often requires more than legal expertise—it calls for an understanding of the practical, the aspirational, and the inevitable complexities of modern healthcare.

Functional Medicine Today; Primary Care Yesterday

By: Jeff Cohen

Medical training has historically been known for its rigor and demanding nature, pushing those in the profession to their physical and mental limits. While this approach was often criticized as “inhumane,” requiring extensive hours and extraordinary effort, it fostered a generation of primary care physicians with unparalleled depth of knowledge and skills. These physicians were not merely general practitioners—they adeptly navigated specialties such as allergy and asthma management, rheumatology, metabolic disorders, minor surgery, orthopedics, and even aspects of obstetrics and gynecology. They operated with confidence and autonomy, with no fear of challenges to their scope of practice from insurance companies, licensing boards, or legal adversaries. But that was “back in the day”—the landscape looks vastly different today.

A Shift in Training and Delivery

The late 1980s marked a turning point. Pressures to ease the burdens of medical training coincided with a broader movement to restructure healthcare delivery and management. The goal was clear—to cut costs and improve outcomes by implementing sweeping changes in care processes. This gave rise to:

  • Clinical Pathways: Standardized treatment plans, often criticized as “cookbook medicine,” that sought to create predictable outcomes.
  • Referral Restrictions: Efforts to limit the number of patients sent to specialist physicians.
  • Outcome-Based Pricing Models: A shift in payment structures aimed at rewarding outcomes rather than utilization.

The underlying hypothesis? Streamline care, reduce reliance on expensive specialties, and pay for results, not services. On paper, it was a compelling vision. But how does it hold up when compared to the realities of today? Has healthcare become less expensive, more effective, or better managed?

The Reality of Modern Healthcare

Despite technological advancements, particularly in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning for data collection and analysis, many would argue the experiment fell short. Costs have not decreased, care remains poorly managed, and the inefficiencies of the system persist. Instead of fostering better outcomes, the structure often rewards utilization over quality.

The root of these inefficiencies lies in a number of systemic flaws:

  • Understaffed Physician Workforce: Many teams are stretched thin, with recruitment falling short of demand.
  • Constrained Training and Responsibilities: Physicians are increasingly restricted by regulations, payer policies, and liability concerns, forcing them to operate within narrow confines.
  • Erosion of Leadership: Medical leadership is not cultivated by the current system—it is stifled instead. What was once celebrated as bold decision-making by skilled “quarterbacks” of care is now thwarted.

The result? A fractured system where initiatives to improve healthcare have inadvertently clipped the wings of innovation and leadership.

Where We Stand Today

Today’s healthcare landscape reinforces a widening gap between “healthcare” and “wellness.” Healthcare, dictated largely by insurance coverage, focuses on acute and catastrophic conditions—be it traumatic injuries or life-threatening illnesses like leukemia. But when it comes to helping people look, feel, and function better for longer, insurance falls short.

Wellness, on the other hand, is driven by consumer demand and paid for out-of-pocket. This has created fertile ground for the growth of functional and personalized medicine approaches such as:

  • Functional Medicine
  • Hormone Replacement Therapy
  • IV Vitamin Therapy
  • Regenerative Medicine

These modalities are designed to address issues beyond the reactive scope of traditional medicine. They appeal to a population that is increasingly skeptical of the status quo and willing to invest in proactive, preventative, and curiosity-driven health solutions.

The Rise of Wellness and Curiosity

The resurgence of wellness-based care signals a return to what makes practitioners truly exceptional—curiosity. Modern physicians and clinicians driving this movement echo the qualities of their predecessors from earlier eras. They question, investigate, and innovate, refusing to settle for passive consumption of conventional wisdom. They are independent thinkers, consistently pushing boundaries to improve outcomes for their patients, often despite resistance from regulators, payers, and liability concerns.

These thought leaders embody the virtues once seen in primary care physicians who fearlessly adapted to deliver comprehensive care for their communities. And they are thriving. If anything, the shortcomings of traditional healthcare models serve as a catalyst, solidifying wellness approaches as permanent pillars within the modern healthcare ecosystem.

A Perfect Storm or a New Beginning?

The emergence of wellness as a burgeoning sector underscores the systemic challenges facing healthcare today. Shrinking insurance coverage, growing consumer financial responsibility, and an apparent divide between treating illness and promoting vitality have all contributed to this shift. For many patients, functional medicine offers something traditional healthcare cannot—a proactive, attentive approach to their individual well-being.

Curiosity-driven medicine bridges the gap between the reactive healthcare system and the proactive pursuit of wellness. As long as the shortcomings of the healthcare industry persist, the growth of wellness-focused care will likely remain firmly rooted in public demand.

The question is no longer whether functional medicine has a place; it’s clear that it does. The real question lies in how healthcare as a whole can evolve to better serve both sides of this growing divide—and what lessons can be drawn from the success of functional and personalized medicine as they continue to rise.

The future of healthcare may well depend on finding ways to merge the efficiency of traditional systems with the passion and curiosity driving today’s wellness movement. It’s a balance we can’t afford to ignore, and one that holds the key to a more holistic and effective system for generations to come.