If you own, invest in, or manage a Management Services Organization (MSO) tied to a Florida medical, dental, or wellness practice, 2026 is the year to take a hard look at your MSO compliance in Florida. Not because Florida has suddenly banned the model — it hasn’t — but because the legal and political environment around MSOs has shifted enough that agreements written five or ten years ago may no longer hold up to the level of scrutiny they’re starting to attract.
This guide walks through why MSO structures are under a brighter spotlight right now, where Florida actually stands on corporate ownership of medical practices, and the specific red flags that show up when we review these agreements for clients.
What an MSO Structure Actually Is
The MSO model exists because most states restrict who can own and operate a medical practice. A licensed physician (or group of physicians) owns the professional entity — the PC, PA, or PLLC that actually delivers care — while a separate management company, the MSO, handles the business side: billing, marketing, HR, facilities, technology, and administrative overhead.
In exchange, the MSO is paid a management fee, and in many structures, non-physician investors hold equity in the MSO itself rather than in the medical practice. Done correctly, this lets outside capital, operational expertise, and economies of scale flow into a practice without a non-physician technically “owning” the practice of medicine.
That distinction — management versus ownership — is the entire legal foundation the MSO model rests on. It’s also the exact place regulators and plaintiffs’ attorneys look first when something goes wrong.
Why MSO Structures Are Under More Scrutiny in 2026
For years, Florida’s business-friendly stance made it one of the more comfortable states for MSO arrangements. That’s still true relative to many other states — but the broader national conversation has changed in ways that matter even here.
Federal proposals targeting corporate ownership. Legislation aimed at restricting corporate and private-equity involvement in medical practices has been introduced at the federal level, with provisions that would limit MSOs from controlling clinical decisions, holding board seats, or structuring management contracts that function like disguised ownership. Even if these proposals don’t pass in their current form, they signal where regulatory appetite is heading.
Other states tightening enforcement. States that already have Corporate Practice of Medicine (CPOM) statutes are enforcing them more aggressively against MSO arrangements that look like ownership in substance, even if not in form. Some states have introduced or advanced bills that would go further — restricting dual ownership between an MSO and the practice it serves, or requiring “meaningful” physician ownership rather than nominal ownership.
Political and media attention on private equity in healthcare. Private-equity-backed MSO and staffing arrangements have drawn sustained criticism from physician advocacy groups, state legislators, and journalists, particularly around emergency medicine and other high-volume specialties. Whether or not a given MSO has anything to do with those specific controversies, the increased attention raises the odds that any MSO agreement — Florida or otherwise — gets a closer read than it used to.
Increased deal activity means increased diligence. As more Florida practices explore MSO partnerships, sales, or recapitalizations, more attorneys, accountants, and buyers are reviewing these agreements line by line during due diligence. Structural weaknesses that went unnoticed for years often surface the moment a transaction is on the table.
Where Florida Actually Stands
Florida does not have a formal Corporate Practice of Medicine statute. Non-physician individuals, corporations, and investors can legally own and operate an MSO, and in many contexts can employ physicians through a properly structured arrangement.
This is a genuine advantage compared to states with strict CPOM doctrines. It’s part of why Florida has become an attractive market for healthcare MSO deals — but the flexibility only helps you if the rest of the structure is built correctly.
“No CPOM statute” does not mean “no rules.” Florida still enforces:
- Fee-splitting prohibitions that restrict payment arrangements tied to patient referrals, regardless of how the contract is labeled.
- Health Care Clinic Act licensing requirements, which apply to many non-physician-owned practices that bill insurance and require a properly appointed medical director.
- Professional licensure boundaries, meaning an MSO — however broad its authority over business operations — cannot direct or interfere with clinical judgment without creating serious exposure.
In other words, Florida gives MSOs more room to operate than most states, but the agreement still has to be built correctly. “Business-friendly” is not the same as “risk-free,” and the flexibility Florida offers only holds up if the structure respects the boundaries that do exist.
Red Flags We See in Existing MSO Agreements
When we review MSO agreements for physician groups, investors, or parties to a pending transaction, a handful of issues come up again and again. In one recent engagement, a routine pre-acquisition review of a multi-location practice’s MSO agreement turned up two of these issues at once — a management fee that scaled directly with patient volume, and physician “owners” who had no real involvement in daily operations. Both had to be restructured before the deal could close.
The most common issues we see:
- Management fees not tied to fair market value. A flat percentage of revenue, a fee that scales with patient volume, or compensation not clearly tied to the actual cost and value of services provided can look less like a management fee and more like a disguised profit split or referral payment.
- MSO involvement in clinical decisions. Even indirect influence — dictating which vendors, protocols, staffing levels, or treatment pathways a practice must use in ways that touch clinical judgment — can undermine the separation the entire structure depends on.
- Physician “ownership” that isn’t meaningful. A licensed physician holding equity on paper, without real involvement in day-to-day operations or clinical decision-making, is increasingly viewed as a workaround rather than genuine ownership.
- Governance documents that don’t match how the business actually runs. Operating agreements, employment contracts, and management services agreements drafted years ago and never updated are one of the most common sources of exposure. The paperwork and the practice often drift apart over time.
- Missing or outdated licensure compliance. Health Care Clinic Act exemptions, medical director appointments, and related filings need to reflect your current ownership and operating structure — not the structure that existed when the practice was first set up.
Recognize one or two of these in your own agreement? Talk to an attorney about your MSO structure before it’s tested by a regulator, auditor, or acquirer — call (561) 455-7700 for a complimentary consultation.
What to Do Now
If any of the above sounds familiar, the right move isn’t to panic — it’s to get a clear-eyed legal review before a regulator, auditor, or prospective buyer does it for you. A practical starting point looks like this:
- Pull the current MSO agreement and any amendments and compare what’s on paper to how the relationship actually operates today.
- Review the management fee structure against fair market value benchmarks for the services actually being provided.
- Map out who controls what — administrative decisions versus clinical decisions — and confirm the line hasn’t blurred over time.
- Confirm physician ownership is substantive, not just nominal, if your structure relies on that distinction.
- Check licensure and Health Care Clinic Act status against your current ownership and operating structure.
For groups actively considering a sale, acquisition, or new MSO partnership, this review should happen well before a term sheet is signed — not during due diligence, when there’s far less room to fix what’s broken.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Florida allow non-physicians to own an MSO? Yes. Florida has no Corporate Practice of Medicine statute, so non-physician individuals, corporations, and investors can legally own and operate a management services organization. The medical practice itself must still be owned in compliance with Florida’s licensing and fee-splitting rules.
Can an MSO in Florida employ physicians directly? In many structures, yes — but the arrangement has to be built so the MSO manages business operations without directing clinical judgment or interfering with the physician-patient relationship. How this is documented matters as much as how it operates day to day.
What makes an MSO management fee non-compliant? A management fee that isn’t tied to the fair market value of the services actually provided — for example, one that scales directly with patient volume or revenue — can be treated as a disguised profit split or referral payment, which raises fee-splitting concerns under Florida law.
Do I need to review my MSO agreement if nothing has gone wrong yet? Yes. Most compliance issues in MSO agreements surface during a sale, audit, or regulatory inquiry — not before. A periodic review, especially before any transaction, is the most reliable way to catch problems while they’re still easy to fix.
Is the MSO model still safe to use in Florida given the national scrutiny on private equity in healthcare? The model itself remains legal and widely used in Florida. The increased scrutiny is on how MSO agreements are structured and operated — particularly management fees, control over clinical decisions, and the substance of physician ownership. A well-built, well-maintained agreement is not the target of this scrutiny; a poorly documented one is.
Talk to a Florida Healthcare Attorney Before Your MSO Structure Is Tested
MSO arrangements aren’t going away, and Florida remains one of the more workable states to build one in — but “workable” only holds up when the agreement is built and maintained correctly. Whether you’re a physician group evaluating a new MSO partnership, an investor structuring a deal, or a practice that hasn’t looked at its management agreement in years, the Florida Healthcare Law Firm can review your structure, flag exposure before it becomes a problem, and help you build (or fix) an arrangement that holds up to scrutiny.
Call (561) 455-7700 for a complimentary consultation, or contact our team online to schedule a review of your MSO agreement. Our attorneys work with physician groups, healthcare investors, and MSOs across Florida and nationwide, and we’ll give you a straight answer about where your structure stands — and what to do next if it doesn’t.
Schedule Your Consultation | Learn More About Our M&A and Transactions Services
